| STEERING COMMITTEE
TELECONFERENCE MINUTES
Minutes of the SC-cc Monday, July 13th
Participants:
John Englund, ITAA
Tamar Frankel, BU
Siegfried Langenbach, DENIC
Javier Sola, AUI
Amadeu Abril i Abril, FCR
Don Heath, ISOC
Martin Burack, ISOC
Robert Shaw, ITU
Marc McFadden, CIX
Leni Mayo, ISOC
Jim Dixon, EuroISPA
Laina Raveendran Greene, APIA
Roberto Gaetano, ETSI
Mike Roberts, Educom
Izumi Aizu, APIA
Werner Staub, ISOC
Sabine Dolderer, DENIC
June Portch, CIX
John Wood, CSSA
Michael Schneider, EuroISPA
Minutes taken by Mark McFadden
STEERING COMMITTEE PARTICIPATION
This morning's Steering Committee conference call focused on the
controversy over who can be a part of the Steering Committee. Several
people expressed the view that the SG had taken a step backward and no
longer had a clear understanding of who the IFWP was or what they should
do. The group accepted consensus that there were different roles for
the Steering Committee and the Program Committees. It generally emerged
that the Steering Committee served three key purposes: facilitating the
global IFWP process, early work in helping facilitate the Reston meeting
(before there was a "program committee") and coordinating the results of
the different venues. The proposal, accepted by consensus, was that SG
members must be:
- from non profit entities;
- have legal status or be legally constituted;
- from the private sector; and,
- be willing to participate actively in the process.
HOW DO YOU DETERMINE IF SOMEONE IS IN THE STEERING COMMITTEE?
New requests to be in the steering committee will be judged against
the
criteria above. The existing group is reviewing the current lists. New
people who want to be in the Steering Committee will be judged based on
the criteria by Michael Schneider, Izumi Aizu and (if he agrees) Michael
Roberts. The entire group may appeal the decision of this new
"credentials committee." The rules for becoming a SC member will be
published. As soon as Mike Roberts agrees the alias credential@ifwp.org
will be set up to point to the three.
STEERING COMMITTEE NOTES
At the Reston meeting the group reached consensus on publishing notes
from its meetings. The format of those notes are to be as follows: the
names of the participants, the outline of the points covered in the
meeting, and any consensus points reached.
EUROPEAN WEB SITE
The European Web site is still not populated with any information,
but a
draft of what may be published there is available at www.isoc.org/ifwp/
and will be moved to the IFWP site shortly.
MAILING LISTS
The group recognized the need for mailing lists and requested a
closed
list for Steering Committee members. The Steering Committee chose to
use the list at listserv@itu.int for internal discussion purposes.
BUDGETS AND 4th MEETING
Substantial discussion took place on how do to budgeting for IFWP.
Specifically it was agreed that there should be a budget set up for the
common IFWP financial requirements and separate ones for each of the
program committees. It was also established that each program committee
should be responsible for the costs and details of webcasting the
conferences as well as any scholarships for encouraging participation
from underrepresented geographic areas.
|