| STEERING COMMITTEE
TELECONFERENCE MINUTES
Mintues of the SC-cc on Thursday, July 16th
participating:
Javier Sola (AUI)
Tamar Frankel (BU)
Jim Dixon (EuroISPA)
David Fares (US-Council)
Mark McFadden (CIX)
Roberto Gaetano (ETSI)
Leni Mayo (ISOC-AU)
Amadey Abril i Abril (FCR)
John Wood (CSSA, CBI, ICC)
Marty Burack (ISOC)
Izumi Aizu (APIA)
Eric Lee (CIX)
John Englund (ITAA)
Michael Schneider (EuroISPA)
Anne-Kathrin Orth
apologies:
Don Heath (ISOC)
Laina Raveendran Green (APIA)
Siegfried Langenbach (DENIC)
1. Following the agenda provided by Michael Schneider, the first
topic
of the conference call was funding. So far, John Wood commited "his"
associations to the funding of 10K ecu, DENIC, EuroISPA and IBM each
sponsored 2K, ISOC (or rather the companies that are contributing
through ISOC) 8K and NSI also 2K. The APIA contribution of 2K will be
used for the Singapor conference.
It was agreed upon that NSI should feel free to sponsor 3rd parties
if
they wish, but that the contributed 2K are the upper limit for funding
as decided in earlier ccs. It was generally agreed to John Woods
statement that it is to be seen as a positive sign that NSI could now be
included in the process. Most likely, they will be sending 7 people to
attend.
Consent was reached that all contributions as well as all expenses
should be posted as a figure and in a breakdown on the Website so as to
continue the openness and transparency of the process. ISOC will be
paying the locations in advance until the money can be reimbursed by
IFWP. It was also decided to split the finances into three regional
pots. The surplus of each conference should flow into an additional
central fund to ensure financial flexibility and to enable redeployment
in case of shortages on the Reston (still to be seen after CIX checks
what bills are still open or were lent by them) or the Asia-Pacific
conference. It was also considered spending this surplus money to the
new entity, though this would be decided if there was really money left
after all conferences have been held.
2. As to the position of the Steering Committee within the IFWP, it
was
agreed upon that no legal status should be assumed, as that might
include taking over legal responsibility. The Steering Committee exists
on an ad hoc basis, cannot decide what goals the IFWP may have nor who
will set up the new IANA. It is unincorporated, rather a process than a
policy body, therefore it cannot have a "charter", only goals or
objectives. These were formulated approximately as follows: it is the
Steering Committee's aim to provide and organise an open, neutral and
transparent process, including the organisation of 3 regional
conferences and presumably a 4th wrap up conference, where people
converge to find consensus. The SC will thereafter be dissolved.
It was decided that a statement along these lines should be made
publicly available as well.
As someone pointed out, DNRC has shown interest in joining the SC. As
there are presumably other interested parties as well, the conditions
and some sort of contact address will also be posted on the Web.
3. A discussion commenced on whether it would be possible to agree on
a
final agenda for the Geneva conference, if not, then how detailed it
could already be and whether the seperate sessions should receive
agendas as well. No real consens could be reached so far.
Relating to Laina's questions, it was agreed that
-the conference really be called the "Geneva-conference", not "Europe",
so as not to exclude the Middle East and Africa.
-ISOC will send out a draft of a new press release for comments to the
discuss-list
-ISOC is momentarily working on getting the registration procedure on
the website set up.
To the question whether the CC-minutes or the consent points should
also
be published, it was agreed that all minutes be commented to decide what
should be revised or adjusted for public and will then be placed along
with the undrafted minutes that are up at the moment.
Please note that the deadline for comments is 24 hours.
4. No one had the slightest wish to decide for a list of proposed
candidates for the interim Board. It was rather considered to be a big
mistake to address candidate matters at this point in time.
5. APIA reported on the progress that has been made for the
Asia-Pacific
meeting so far: several associations including APNIC and APPLe have
agreed to join in the process, a hotel has also been chosen. All data on
that will be published or circled within the next few days.
|